{"id":1375,"date":"2014-12-19T12:54:48","date_gmt":"2014-12-19T12:54:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/?p=1375"},"modified":"2016-01-26T10:35:25","modified_gmt":"2016-01-26T10:35:25","slug":"best-in-show","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/?p=1375","title":{"rendered":"Best in show?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the great things about the REF is the way every one&#8217;s a winner. Well, not everyone. But there are three different categories of stuff being measured, and two obvious choices of modifier. The things being &#8220;measured&#8221; are:<\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>Outputs: these are the actual papers<\/li>\r\n<li>Impact: this is a measure of how an institution&#8217;s research has impacted outside the academy<\/li>\r\n<li>Environment: this is a nebulous bucket containing completed PhD students, grants won, and softness of toilet paper. Or something<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>And the obvious modifiers are number of people submitted (this gives us &#8220;power&#8221;, and is used as a multiplier) and proportion of &#8220;world class&#8221; (4*) research.  So I&#8217;ve seen press releases saying &#8220;World class for impact&#8221;, and &#8220;Top 20&#8221; meaning top 20 for power, or top 20 for 4*, or top 20 for outputs alone. Across the UK, press offices have been frantically sorting REF spreadsheets to find a measure by which their departments do well. <\/p>\r\n<p>Chris Hanretty (a politics lecturer from UEA) <a href = \"http:\/\/chrishanretty.co.uk\/blog\/index.php\/2014\/12\/18\/ref2014-spin-generating-spreadsheet\/\">has generated a spreadsheet which lets you experiment with all of these metrics<\/a>, and I have shamelessly plagiarised the section of this concerning Welsh Computer Science departments.<\/p>\r\n<h2>Here&#8217;s the full REF story for Aberystwyth Computer Science<\/h2>\r\n<ul>\r\n<li>We&#8217;re best in Wales for impact power, output power, and overall power (these measures all take into account how many people were entered)<\/li>\r\n<li>We&#8217;re 2nd in Wales for environment power (taking into account number submitted). We&#8217;re also 2nd for impact rank and world-leading outputs (not taking into account number submitted)<\/li>\r\n<li>We&#8217;re 3rd in Wales for overall rank, output rank, and environment rank, and also for world-leading impact, environment, and &#8220;overall world-leading&#8221;. None of these measures take into account staff numbers<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p>All of these stories are true; some of them put us in a better light than others though.<\/p>\r\n<p>What does it mean? Well, it means we submitted a lot of people, those people were good, and quite a lot of the things we submitted were world-leading. There&#8217;s a game to be played when doing the REF, and that game involves who&#8217;s in and who&#8217;s out: some institutions have played it so that they submit a small proportion of their staff, but those they submit are superb; others play it so that they submit lots of good staff. We went for the latter, and it shows, submitting 24.8 (Swansea submitted 19.6 and Cardiff 13.7).  I heard informally that we were one of the departments with the highest proportion of staff submitted in the UK.<\/p>  \r\n<p>Why is this good? Well it means that if you come to study computer science in Aberystwyth, a lot of the people who teach you will also do world class research.  It also (I think) reflects the way the money will be distributed, so we should get a bit more research cash too.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the great things about the REF is the way every one&#8217;s a winner. Well, not everyone. But there are three different categories of stuff being measured, and two obvious choices of modifier. The things being &#8220;measured&#8221; are: Outputs: these are the actual papers Impact: this is a measure of how an institution&#8217;s research has impacted outside the academy Environment: this is a nebulous bucket containing completed PhD students, grants won, and softness of toilet paper. Or something And the obvious modifiers are number of people submitted (this gives us &#8220;power&#8221;, and is used as a multiplier) and proportion of &#8220;world class&#8221; (4*) research.<span class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/?p=1375\">Read More &rarr;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[72,71],"class_list":["entry","author-handee","post-1375","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-he-politics","tag-politics","tag-university"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1375","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1375"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1375\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1380,"href":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1375\/revisions\/1380"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hannahdee.wales\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}